Teknologi Berhujah

Teknologi Berhujjah

Orang kita ni memang suka berhujjah ….Bila berlaku perbezaan pendapat, ketika bertemu dua pihak yg berbeza pendapat ni biasanya akan berlaku perdebatan atau perbincangan. Dlm pd itu masing2 pihak akan mengemukakan hujjah …….dah tentu la setiap pihak akan cuba mematahkan hujah lawannya. Mereka akan cuba buktikan bhw pihaknya yg benar dan pihak lawan yg salah. Dlm proses mengemukakan hujjah ni kadang2 berlaku tindakan menyindir2,merendah2,memperlekeh …….berlaku juga cubaan mencabar dan menaikkan emosi pihak lawan …… mereka tak sedar pihak lawan tu juga saudara mereka ……maksudnya sama2 Islam. Maka berlakulah ketegangan antara dua pihak ….sekurang2nya ketegangan emosi yg ketara.Akhirnya Satu pihak menang berhujjah …satu lagi kalah.Rasanya pihak yg kalah tu tak bersedia utk menikut pendapat pihak yg menang ..hal ini krn emosi yg kalah tu terluka …..mungkin mereka terasa dendam,marah,benci dll…. Mereka benar2 dikuasai sentimen.Mengikut ilmu psikologi biasanya sentimen begini boleh menghalang awareness(kesedaran) …dan juga menghalang insight (celik akal).
Kedua2 pihak yg berhujjah ni wajar merujuk kpd. Objektif mereka ……Kalau inginkan pihak lawan mengikuti pendapat mereka ,maka wajar lah cara berhujjah tu diperbaiki. Jgn asyik nak menang saja …..selit juga keinginan utk buat pihak lawan menerima pendapatnya.
Semasa berhujjah biasanya setiap pihak akan mengemukan hujjah berupa maklumat,data,perbandingan dsbnya …..agar pihak lawan mendapat tahu apa yg sepatutnya….Tapi jgn lupa utk memeriksa persepsi lawan ….sejauh mana mereka dpt menerima hujjah2 yg dikemukakan,aspek mana dri hujjah tersebut mereka bersetuju dan aspek mana pula mereka tak bersetuju.


assalamualaikum.....this article was written by an ustaz in Newcastle about debate. What he said is right. For me, I would say niyyah @intention is very important in doing debate (honestly, this is the hardest bit). If we want to get a better understanding or solution upon certain matter out of that debate, then obviously we would have to make sure that the debate is not an emotional one and readily to accept the truth even if it is brought forward by the other side. Or, like most people do (me as well sometime), their intention is to win the debate. ONCE we have this intention, our debate will be very2 destructive instead of constructive. Wonder Y?? We will manipulate data and facts just to support our argument. We will not elicit fact which is in favour of our opponent. For the sake of winning people will do these two things. Very destructive isn't it??
Please say yes...

p/s to get better understanding about what ive just scribbled, 6 Hat thinking by Edward de Bono is a good one. I've got a ppt doc regarding that book. If anyone interested just email me. I can be reached at eljundiyy_84@yahoo.com